The Heidelberg Catechism
Q74. Should infants, too, be baptized?
A. Yes.
Infants as well as adults
are in God's covenant and are his people.
They, no less than adults, are promised
the forgiveness of sin through Christ's blood
and the Holy Spirit who produces faith.
Therefore, by baptism, the mark of the covenant,
infants should be received into the Christian church
and should be distinguished from the children of unbelievers.
This was done in the Old Testament by circumcision,
which was replaced in the New Testament by baptism.
Gen. 17:7, Matt. 19:14, Isa. 44:1-3, Acts 2:38-39; 16:31; 10:47, 1 Cor. 7:14, Gen. 17:9-14, Col. 2:11-13
Ooh, controversial stuff today. This is one of the major differences between say, Presbyterians and Baptists. Presbyterians do baptize babies. It's nice. You have a baby, and you certainly want your child to know the Lord, so you have the pastor baptize your kid as a way of proclaiming that your whole family is devoted to the Lord and that you intend to raise your child in a godly manner and also to make a public petition to the Lord to keep an eye on your kid. In the Bible, the apostles often baptized whole families when the head of the household converted. They did it back then, so we see no reason why we shouldn't do it now. But in reality, infant baptism doesn't contribute to the child's actual salvation. That only occurs when the child or adult comes to believe in Jesus as his/her personal savior. On this point, both Baptists and Presbyterians would agree. But Baptists would take it a step further and say, since it does the child no good, why do it at all? They would further point out Biblical passages that emphasize baptism following the moment of conversion. In other words, you should only become baptized after you (at a mature enough age) accept Christ.
It doesn't seem like something that important, right? I mean, if we're all Christians, then shouldn't we be able to find some sort of compromise on this issue? Well, the problem is that if you go to a church that really stresses that the Bible is the WORD of God, and you're serious about making it the rule and guide for your life, there is really not that much room to compromise. If you have a strong doctrine for the Word of God, it becomes problematic and somewhat dangerous at any point to say, well, let's just ignore this part, or for the sake of church unity, let's just agree to disagree. Certainly, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but in the end, the church and pastor have authority and must say somewhere that this is what the Bible is saying. This is why at a lot of non-denominational churches, they have some pretty fuzzy teachings on certain issues. They avoid the hard questions so as to not offend or exclude anyone. But what suffers in the process is their view of the Bible as being able to provide answers, and ultimately, the truth. Instead of, "the Bible says this", our practical theology becomes, "well, the Bible's not really clear on this, so, I'm just gonna go with what makes sense to me." Of course, we all do that to some extent, but it's all about minimizing this kind of thinking, making it the exception rather than the rule of our Christian walk...
Ok, that was my rant for the week...
Recent Comments